Disney Stock Slides After Q4 Miss, YouTube TV Rift

Wed, November 26, 2025

Disney Stock Slides After Q4 Miss, YouTube TV Rift

Walt Disney Co. (DIS) delivered a mixed set of recent results: robust streaming subscriber gains and rising direct‑to‑consumer profitability contrasted with a revenue shortfall and an unresolved carriage dispute with YouTube TV. The combination of bright spots and concrete near‑term risks produced notable volatility in the share price and forced management to lean on capital returns to soothe investor concerns.

Streaming Momentum vs. Legacy Headwinds

Subscriber growth and DTC profitability

Disney reported a meaningful uptick in streaming customers, adding roughly 12.4 million subscribers across its Disney+ and Hulu platforms. Disney+ grew by about 3.8 million subscribers to roughly 131.6 million, while Hulu posted an unusually large gain near 8.5 million — the biggest lift in recent history for that service. Those additions helped the company post stronger direct‑to‑consumer (DTC) operating results: quarterly DTC operating income rose materially, and full‑year DTC operating income moved from a near‑breakeven position into positive territory at an estimated $1.33 billion.

Traditional media pressures and a missed top line

Despite streaming strength, Disney’s total revenue came in below analyst consensus, with reported revenue around $22.5 billion versus roughly $22.8 billion expected. The company’s entertainment and linear TV lines continue to show softness — advertising and certain legacy distribution channels declined, and linear TV operating profit fell significantly year‑over‑year. Those declines underscore that while streaming is scaling, the legacy piece of Disney’s business still exerts meaningful pressure on near‑term top‑line performance.

The YouTube TV Carriage Dispute: A Concrete Drag

Immediate revenue impact

Beyond macro headwinds, a tangible operational risk emerged in the form of a carriage dispute with YouTube TV that began recently and remains unresolved. Industry estimates put the weekly revenue hit to Disney at roughly $30 million while the blackout continues. Management’s public stance — signaling readiness to hold out in negotiations — added to investor uncertainty because lost distribution dollars flow directly to the bottom line until a deal is reached.

Why this matters for DIS stock

Carriage disputes have a real and measurable effect: they reduce advertising reach, cut affiliate fees and can accelerate cord‑cutting among subscribers frustrated by channel blackouts. For a company navigating a transition from legacy to streaming revenues, these disputes are not abstract — they bite into cash flow and create headline risk that can amplify share price swings.

Capital Returns and Shareholder Signaling

Bigger buybacks and a higher dividend

To counterbalance earnings jitters, Disney increased its share repurchase authorization to about $7 billion and raised the dividend roughly 50% to $1.50 per share. These moves are designed to support EPS and reward shareholders while management executes the streaming transition.

Balance of tradeoffs

While aggressive buybacks and a higher payout can stabilize sentiment, they require reliable free cash flow. With legacy revenue pressured and distribution disputes ongoing, investors will be watching not just headline capital‑return numbers but the company’s ability to sustain them as operating conditions evolve.

Stock Reaction and Investor Takeaways

The immediate market response was sharp: DIS shares fell noticeably following the earnings release amid elevated trading volume, reflecting investor concern about the revenue miss and the carriage dispute. Even with intraday recoveries in subsequent sessions, the stock remains below recent highs — a sign that traders are weighing streaming upside against concrete legacy risks.

For investors, the current picture is clear and actionable: Disney’s streaming trajectory is accelerating toward profitability, which is a durable positive, but a measurable near‑term headwind exists in legacy TV performance and in the YouTube TV blackout that is costing the company real dollars each week. Management’s stepped‑up shareholder returns provide a cushion, but their sustainability depends on the company’s ability to convert streaming scale and margin expansion into consistent free cash flow.

Conclusion

Recent developments make Disney a tale of two forces: accelerating streaming momentum that improves long‑term earnings power, and immediate, quantifiable headwinds in traditional distribution that have pressured revenue and stock performance. Short‑term investors will focus on resolution of the YouTube TV dispute and upcoming quarterly cadence; longer‑term holders will be tracking whether streaming margins and cash flow can consistently replace the legacy revenue base. Either way, the story driving DIS today is concrete and measurable — subscriber growth and DTC profitability on one side, and tangible carriage and legacy media losses on the other.